Legal Opinion

People v. Fioco

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 13, 2014No. Court of Appeals No. 12CA1529PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JUDGE WEBB

{1 Section 14(4)(b) (the 14(4)(b) defense) of the Medical Marijuana Amendment {Amendment), article XVIII of the Colorado Constitution, creates an affirmative defense to the offense of cultivating marijuana, where the plants are needed for medical use. Whether this defense can be asserted based on a physician's assessment obtained after the offense has been committed presents a novel question. We conclude that the 14(4)(b) defense cannot be raised based on such an after-the-fact assessment. Therefore, we affirm the judgment of conviction of defendant, Stephen S. Fioeo,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. Deanna CostelloCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. People v. GarciaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005
  3. Gordon v. BensonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  4. People v. PickeringSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011
  5. City of Westminster v. Dogan Construction Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. HeywoodColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. People v. DouglasColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. People v. RamirezColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. People v. AllmanColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Stoesz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API