Legal Opinion

People v. Heywood

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 14, 2014No. Court of Appeals No. 11CA2165PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

JUDGE WEBB

T1 A jury convicted Jason Jackson Heywood of violating section 18-3-405.4(1)(b), C.R.S.2013, Internet sexiial exploitation of a child. As relevant here, this statute applies if the actor knowingly importunes, invites, or entices another person, whom the actor knows or believes to be younger than fifteen years old, to view his intimate parts through a computer network. Resolving a novel question, we conclude that importuning, inviting, or enticing requires more than allowing such viewing to continue, after the actor comes to know or believe that the viewer is less than…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. People v. MillerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2005

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. McCoy v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2019
  2. People v. RedigerSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018
  3. v. KesslerColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
  4. People v. RedigerColorado Court of Appeals · 2015
  5. v. DenhartogColorado Court of Appeals · 2019

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API