Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Company
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided March 3, 1960No. 59-744PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
118 So.2d 253 (1960)
Minerva GOLDSTEIN and Her Husband, Benjamin Goldstein, Petitioners,
v.
GREAT ATLANTIC & PACIFIC TEA COMPANY et al., Respondents.
No. 59-744.
District Court of Appeal of Florida. Third District.
March 3, 1960.
Richard E. Thomas and Von Zamft & Kravitz and Sam Bloom, Miami, for petitioners.
Brown, Dean, Adams & Fischer and Dixon, DeJarnette, Bradford, Williams, McKay & Kimbrell, Miami, for respondents.
CARROLL, CHAS., Judge.
Review of a discovery order in a common law negligence action is sought by a petition for certiorari. See Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. Timmons, Fla. 1952, 61…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Seaboard Air Line R. Co. v. TimmonsSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Florida · 1949
- City of Lake Worth v. First Nat. Bank in Palm BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
3Cited by13 opinions
- Burnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Commonwealth v. HutchinsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Shell v. State Road DepartmentSupreme Court of Florida · 1961
- Alachua General Hosp., Inc. v. Zimmer USA, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Travelers Indemnity Company v. FieldsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.