Legal Opinion

Burnett v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided October 27, 1982No. 65324PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CLINTON, Judge.

This is an automatic appeal1 from a conviction for capital murder2 in which the punishment assessed is death.

*767The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged, and, because they are unnecessary to our disposition of appellant’s fifth ground of error, the facts constituting the offense need not be recited. We are constrained to reverse.

By her fifth ground of error, appellant contends the trial court erred by admitting a tape recorded conversation between her and James Michael Boulch, a hypnotist hired by her attorneys, over her objection that such admission was in…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. State v. HurdSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  5. People v. ShirleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. In re McCannCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013
  2. Henderson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  3. Zimmerman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  5. Carmona v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API