Legal Opinion

Kraft v. Pattyn

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1959No. 9815PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MR. JUSTICE ANGSTMAN:

This action was upon a promissory note in the sum of $2,275.

Like the answer in 342 Pac. (2d) 1060, the defendant in his answer in this case admits that his signature appears on the note in question, but denied that he delivered and executed to *573plaintiff a note for $2,275, and alleged the fact to be that he is not indebted to plaintiff in the sum of $2,275 but only owes him an amount not in excess of $800.

The answer also contained two affirmative defenses. The first was predicated upon fraud in procuring the signature of the defendant while in an extremely intoxicated…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kraft v. PattynMontana Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eslinger v. Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Eslinger v. Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Kraft v. PattynMontana Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API