Legal Opinion · Dissent

Kraft v. Pattyn

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 20, 1959No. 9816Published

1Dissent

MR. JUSTICE BOTTOMLY:

(dissenting).

I dissent. Under the ridings of the district court, the facts and circumstances and the testimony of the plaintiff himself, I would overrule the judgment of the district court and order a new trial, as in the companion case, Kraft v. Pattyn, Mont., 342 Pac. (2d) 1063.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kraft v. PattynMontana Supreme Court · 1959