Legal Opinion · Dissent
Kraft v. Pattyn
Montana Supreme Court
Decided July 20, 1959No. 9816Published
1Dissent
MR. JUSTICE BOTTOMLY:
(dissenting).
I dissent. Under the ridings of the district court, the facts and circumstances and the testimony of the plaintiff himself, I would overrule the judgment of the district court and order a new trial, as in the companion case, Kraft v. Pattyn, Mont., 342 Pac. (2d) 1063.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kraft v. PattynMontana Supreme Court · 1959