Legal Opinion
Hill v. Goord
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided September 2, 1999No. CV 98-3088(ADS)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
In this lawsuit pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the pro se incarcerated plaintiff, David T. Hill (“Hill” or the “plaintiff’), claims that various New York State and Suffolk County officers and agencies failed to amend an incorrect statement in the Pre-Sentence Report contained in his inmate records, as a result of which he was wrongfully denied his requests to be released to parole supervision. He seeks money damages for his emotional distress, and injunction in the form of an Order from this Court directing the State to afford him an “immediate parole…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bodie v. MorgenthauDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
- USF Insurance v. Clarendon America InsuranceDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2006
- Intellective, Inc. v. Massachusetts Mutual Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Davis v. CotovDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Ruffins v. DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICESDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.