Legal Opinion

Kokinakes v. British Leyland, Ltd

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 6, 1983No. Docket 59767PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiff initiated suit for injuries

sustained in a one-car automobile accident, alleging negligent design and breach of warranty on the part of the automobile’s manufacturer. Following trial, the jury returned a special verdict, finding that defendant British Leyland, Ltd., was not negligent and that it did not breach an implied warranty of fitness. Plaintiff appeals as of right.

Plaintiff argues first that reversible error occurred when defense counsel mentioned, in closing argument, that plaintiff was not seeking compensation for medical bills or for the first three years of wage loss…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Reetz v. Kinsman Marine Transit Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Citizens Insurance Co. of America v. TuttleMichigan Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Felice v. WeinmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Fireman's Fund American Insurance Companies v. General Electric Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Schwark v. LillyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Guerrero v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  2. Phillips v. Mazda Motor Manufacturing (USA) Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. Argenta v. ShahanMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Guider v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Guider v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API