Legal Opinion
Brandli v. Micrus Endovascular Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 21, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2011-1743PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PAUL L. FRIEDMAN, United States District Judge
Plaintiff Karen Brandli brought this sex discrimination suit against her former employer, Micrus Endovascular Corporation (“Micrus”), Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. (“JJSI”), Codman & Shurtleff, Inc. (“Codman”), and James Bertrand. Brandli was a Micrus employee under Bertrand’s supervision until 2010 when JJSI acquired Micrus and merged it with Codman, a business JJSI owned. In the process, Mi-crus terminated Brandli’s employment. Defendants have collectively moved for summary judgment on the grounds that they had legitimate,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Holcomb, Christine v. Powell, DonaldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Breen v. MinetaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Baskerville v. CBS News Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Dickerson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2022
- Earle v. United States Securities and Exchange CommissionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Grant v. Csl Behring LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.