Joseph . Saunders/ v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority. Timothy D. Smith v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
Appellants have moved for leave to file in these consolidated cases a bill of costs pursuant to Rule 39 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. 1 The bill of costs lists expenditures for docket fees and the printing of briefs, and appellants’ share of the expense of printing of a joint appendix. Appellee, the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), opposes the motion on two grounds.
First, WMATA contends that appellants waived their right to recover as costs any part of the charge for printing the joint appendix by joining in a stipulation which called for the parties to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chicago Sugar Co. v. American Sugar Refining Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1949
- Shima v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
- Chemical Bank & Trust Co. v. Prudence-Bonds Corp. (New Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
- McKnight v. AkinsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1951
- Smith v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
3Cited by16 opinions
- Baez v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- In Re Ricoh Co., Ltd. Patent LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Continental Air Lines, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Lukas E. Hoska, III v. United States Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.