Legal Opinion
O. B. Thompson Electric Co. v. Milliman & Larson, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 29, 1964No. 39,250PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
This is an appeal from an order denying petitioner’s motion to intervene in a mechanics lien foreclosure action. The question we consider is. whether the filing of a proposed answer together with a petition and motion to intervene in the lien foreclosure proceedings, where the motion is made prior to but not heard until after a year from the date of furnishing the last item in the lien statement, constitutes, the filing of an answer in compliance with the provisions of Minn. St. 514.11.
It appears that on November 2, 1962, plaintiff, O. B. Thompson Electric Company, began a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Johnson v. StarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Emery v. HertigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
- Carr-Cullen Co. v. CooperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- North Star Iron Works Co. v. StrongSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Aaby v. Better Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
3Cited by4 opinions
- Armco Steel Corp. v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Albert and Harlow Inc. v. Great Northern Oil Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Rochester's Suburban Lumber Company v. SlocumbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Ryan Contracting, Inc. v. JAG INVESTMENTS, INC.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000