Legal Opinion

District of Columbia v. Chase Manhattan Bank

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1997No. 95-TX-1599PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FERREN, Associate Judge:

This case presents an issue of first impression in this court: can the District of Columbia, consistent with the Due Process Clause, tax the annual net income of a testamentary trust created by the will of an individual who died while domiciled in the District, when the trustee, trust assets, and trust beneficiaries are all presently located outside the District. We hold that the Due Process Clause does not prevent the District from imposing such a tax, given the continuing supervisory relationship which the District’s courts have with respect to administration of such…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Miller Brothers Co. v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. New York Ex Rel. Cohn v. GravesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. LONG BEACH MORTGAGE LOAN TRUST 2001-4District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  2. Chase Manhattan Bank v. GavinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  3. Lehman Bros. Bank, FSB v. State Bank CommissionerSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
  4. Haymond v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeConnecticut Superior Court · 1997
  5. Linn v. The Deparrtment of RevenueAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API