Winterton v. Van Zandt
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MAUGHMER, Commissioner.
This suit, in which originally four individuals and one insurance company were involved, is here for the second time. The *694rights and responsibilities of Winterton, Van Zandt and the Company have been fully and finally adjudicated. There remains, however, some dispute between two of the interpleaders, namely, William J. Cason, the present appellant, and Kelso Journey, the present respondent. We shall recite the facts in sufficient detail to identify and present this remaining controversy.
Since 1940, Senator Kelso Journey, respondent, has been a practicing attorney in…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Winterton v. Van ZandtSupreme Court of Missouri · 1961
- McManus v. BurrowsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1915
- Winterton v. Van ZandtMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963
3Cited by4 opinions
- Moore v. PrindableMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Horry County v. WoodwardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
- Keyes Fibre Co. v. C. J. Merrill, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- Ernest B. Williams IV, PLLC v. The Association Of Unit Owners Of The Five Hundred And One Union BuildingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2021