Legal Opinion
Moore v. Prindable
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided July 9, 1991No. 58880PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARY M. GAERTNER, Presiding Judge.
In this appeal from an interpleader action, appellants, Jack Prindable, James Walsh and Lillian Walsh, claim error by the trial court in its finding respondent, Larry Moore, was entitled to $20,800.00 in commissions plus prejudgment interest for acting as the broker in the sale of certain unimproved real estate. We modify the judgment, affirm the award of commissions and reverse the judgment as to its award of interest.
In 1986, respondent was a licensed real estate broker in Missouri working for Southland Corporation as a real estate representative. In the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rosalind Gelfgren, and Larry Gelfgren v. Republic National Life Insurance Company Ilwu-Pma Welfare Fund, Ilwu-Pma Welfare Fund, Cross-Complainant in Interpleader v. Rosalind Gelfgren and Larry Gelfgren, Cross-Defendants in InterpleaderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Covino v. PfefferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Land Clearance for Redevelopment Authority v. ZitkoSupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Bevins v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Dean Vincent, Inc. v. Chef Joe's, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Insurance Co. of North America v. Skyway Aviation, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Business Consulting Services, Inc. v. WicksSupreme Court of Iowa · 2005
- Gardner v. BlahnikMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Wally & Co. v. Briarcliff Development Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2012
- Ernest B. Williams IV, PLLC v. The Association Of Unit Owners Of The Five Hundred And One Union BuildingCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.