McGuire v. Callahan
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Vigo Common Ple.as.
1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.
Action by Callahan against McGuire, for goods sold and delivered, etc.
*129Trial; verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.
The case is before us on the evidence, which strongly-preponderates in favor of the defendant, though, in some respects, it is conflicting. There is one particular, however, in which it totally fails to sustain the verdict. The plaintiff had executed to the defendant the following instrument, in writing, viz:
“In consideration of my indebtedness to Andrew McGuire, and the costs of his suit against me, and certain claims which the said McGuire agrees to pay for me, I have sold,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cited by10 opinions
- Fay v. BurdittIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Joest v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Citizens' Street Railroad v. HortonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
- Indianapolis Abattoir Co. v. BaileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
- Watson Coal & Mining Co. v. CasteelIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.