Legal Opinion

Fraley v. Nickels

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided September 20, 1917PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to an order of the Circuit Court of Scott county, confirming an award in arbitration proceedings. The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtKelly, J.

On the 18th day of May, 1915, W. H. Nickels and Ephraim Fraley entered into a written agreement whereby they submitted to C. H. Cowden and C. P. Rogers as arbitrators, a controversy concerning a boundary line. The agreement provided that Cowden and Rogers should select a third arbitrator, hear such legal evidence pertaining to title as either party might introduce before them, make their award in writing, and return the same to the clerk’s office of the county to be “confirmed by the court according to the statute.”

On September 20, 1915, there was presented and filed in the clerk’s office a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Omaha v. Omaha Water Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Gas Co. v. WheelingWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Omaha Water Co. v. City of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1908
  4. Doyle v. PattersonSupreme Court of Virginia · 1888

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Virginia Beach Board of Realtors, Inc. v. Goodman Segar Hogan, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  2. Stewart v. County Court of Monongalia CountyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API