Legal Opinion

A. J. Cannon & Co. v. Collier

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided November 1, 1954No. 35329PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Felton, C. J.(a) The assignment of error, “To said rulipg [the granting of a nonsuit], the plaintiff duly excepted and now excepts and assigns said ruling and judgment of nonsuit as error,” is sufficient to present a question for review. Fargason v. Ford, 119 Ga. 343 (46 S. E. 431); Randolph v. Brunswick & Birmingham R. Co., 120 Ga. 969 (48 S. E. 396); Baker v. Higgenbotham, 186 Ga. 895 (2) (199 S. E. 174).(b) The assignment of error, “To this ruling of the court [the overruling of demurrers to the answers], the plaintiff in error excepted and now excepts and assigns the same as error upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Toomey v. Read & GreshamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  2. McGregor v. Third National Bank of AtlantaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Randolph v. Brunswick & Birmingham RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Fargason v. FordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Baker v. HiggenbothamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dean v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  2. Ferguson v. StrattonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API