Legal Opinion

McCombs v. Bridges

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 4, 1968No. 18799Published

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order of the lower court denying a motion to strike certain allegations of the complaint as *250irrelevant, immaterial and redundant, and also denying a motion to require that the complaint be made more definite and certain.

The general rule is well settled that an order refusing to strike allegations in a pleading as irrelevant and redundant is not conclusive upon the trial of the case upon the merits, and that an interlocutory appeal from such order will not lie. Register v. Niagara Fire Ins. Co., 248 S. C. 504, 151 S. E. (2d) 640.

It is also a settled general rule that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oxman v. ProfittSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  2. Miles v. Charleston Light & Water Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1910
  3. Standard Sewing Machine Co. v. HenrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1895
  4. Register v. Niagara Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API