Legal Opinion

Register v. Niagara Fire Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 1, 1966No. 18577PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order of the lower court denying a motion to strike certain allegations of the complaint as irrelevant, immaterial, and redundant.

The general rule is well settled that an order refusing to strike allegations in a pleading as irrelevant and redundant is not conclusive upon the trial of the case on the merits and is not appealable. Sparks v. D. M. Dew & Sons, Inc., 230 S. C. 507, 96 S. E. (2d) 488; Winchester v. United Insurance Co., 231 S. C. 288, 98 S. E. (2d) 530; Blackmon v. United Insurance Co., 233 S. C. 424, 105 S. E. (2d) 521; Tate v. Oxner, 236 S. C. 313, 114…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Blackmon v. United Insurance Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1958
  2. Winchester v. United InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  3. Sparks v. D. M. Dew & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  4. Tate v. OxnerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  5. Mason v. S. S. Kresge Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1966

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McCombs v. BridgesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API