Legal Opinion
Grupo Industrial Camesa v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 10, 1996No. 94-1436PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARCHER, Chief Judge.
Grupo Industrial Camesa et al. (Camesa) appeal the judgment of the United States Court of International Trade affirming the International Trade Commission’s (Commission) final determination that during 1989 to 1992 an industry in the United States was materially injured by reason of imports of steel wire rope from Mexico and the Republic of Korea. Grupo Indus. Camesa v. United States, 853 F.Supp. 440 (Ct. Int’l Trade 1994). We affirm.
BACKGROUND
In April 1992 an antidumping action was filed against imports of steel wire rope from Mexico and Korea. The Department of Commerce…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Manhattan General Equipment Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Altx, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2001
- Taiwan Semiconductor Industry Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
- Makita Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1997
- Allegheny Ludlum Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2000
- Grupo Industrial Camesa v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.