Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Martin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1862PublishedCited by 2 opinions

APPEAL from the Hush Common Pleas.

1Per curiam

Martin, who was the plaintiff, sued John Foster, William Crawford, Margaret Frazier, and Joseph Hamilton, in replevin, to recover a brick-kiln. Foster was defaulted. The other defendants appeared and answered: 1. By a denial. 2. Property in themselves, etc. The issues were tried by the Court, who found for the plaintiff, and judgment was, accordingly, rendered, etc. The record shows that, at that, the October, term of said Court, in the year 1858, being the term next after the trial and judgment, Crawford and Frazier, two of the defendants, moved for a new trial, on two grounds: 1. That the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Simpson v. WilsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
  2. Hull v. KirkpatrickIndiana Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sanders v. LoyIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  2. Cleaveland v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1863

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API