Hull v. Kirkpatrick
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Blackford Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.
This was an action of trespass on the case by Kirkpatrick against Hull. The declaration contains three counts. The first charges that Hull, in a certain exchange of horses with Kirkpatrick, falsely represented his, Hull's, horse to be sound, when in truth, &c., he was not sound, but at the time of said exchange was, and still is, unsound, having a disease called glanders. The second count is similar to the first, with this exception : it alleges that Hull, when the exchange took place, knew his horse to be unsound. The third is, in substance, the same as the second, excepting an averment that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Edmonds v. PaskinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1846
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hines v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Richie v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Ludwig v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
- Graham v. NowlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Rainey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.