Legal Opinion
Breiterman v. U.S. Capitol Police
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 16, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2016-0893Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JODI BREITERMAN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 16-893 (TJK) UNITED STATES CAPITOL POLICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Jodi Breiterman sued her employer, the U.S. Capitol Police, for discrimination and retali- ation. The Court granted summary judgment for her employer, and the Circuit affirmed. The Capitol Police seek an award of costs related to eleven depositions taken in the litigation, and Breiterman opposes as to six of the eleven. For the reasons explained below, the Court will award costs to the Capitol Police for all eleven…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Mother and Father v. James CassidyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Baez v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Sun Ship, Inc. v. LehmanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Long v. Howard UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Brenda Colosi v. Jones Lang LaSalle Americas, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.