Commonwealth v. Sholcosky
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZAPPALA, Justice.
This is an appeal by the Commonwealth from the Superior Court’s memorandum opinion and order vacating the judgment of sentence imposed upon Ronald Sholcosky and remanding the case for a new trial. We granted allocatur to address the issue of whether a prior inconsistent statement of a non-party witness may be used as substantive evidence if the proponent of the statement does not question the witness in court concerning the statement. Because the Superior Court’s decision is consistent with our opinion in Commonwealth v. Brady, 510 Pa. 123, 507 A.2d 66 (1986), and its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BradySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Commonwealth v. LivelySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. BurgosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. DennisonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ColavitaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Buehl v. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- Gormley v. EdgarSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Buehl v. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.