Legal Opinion
Buehl v. Vaughn
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided January 20, 1999No. 97-1241UnknownCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALITO, Circuit Judge:
Roger Peter Buehl appeals the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Convicted in state court for a triple homicide, Buehl claims that his due process rights were violated and that he received ineffective assistance of counsel at trial and on direct appeal. Because we conclude that Buehl’s due process rights were not violated and that his ineffective assistance claims fail to meet the standard of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984), we affirm the judgment of the District Court.
I
On July 16,1982,…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Buehl v. VaughnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999