Legal Opinion

Goddard v. Heintzelman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 19, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

BECK, J.:

¶ 1 This is an appeal from a trial court’s order that registered and confirmed a California order for child support against ap-pellee-Mother and in favor of appellant-Father. On appeal, Father contends that the trial court erred in calculating arrears because the court refused to include interest due. Father also claims that the trial court improperly set an arrears payment schedule without permitting Father to establish that other methods of payment were more appropriate. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS

¶ 2 Mother and Father’s son was born in 1986 and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Morabito's Auto Sales v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  3. Child Support Enforcement Division of Alaska v. BrenckleMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  4. Morrissey v. MorrisseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Keller v. MeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Mutual Benefit Insurance v. PolitopoulosSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Com. v. Palsha, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. McKeehan, D. & M. v. Milton Hershey Med CntrSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
  5. Total Home Care and Inspection v. Carlevale, P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API