Legal Opinion

Keller v. Mey

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 10, 2013PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

DONOHUE, J.:

Michael R. Mey, et al. and Mey & Sulla, et al. (“Appellants”) appeal from the orders denying their motion to strike and petition to open, both of which were filed in response to the entry of default judgment against Appellants and in favor of David Keller (“Keller”). For the following reasons, we affirm.

We are presented with extraordinarily convoluted factual and procedural histories, the complexity of which is compounded by the fact that the certified record on appeal has been compiled in what seems to be no particular sequence, is missing pertinent transcripts and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Cintas Corp. v. Lee's Cleaning Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  2. US Bank N.A. v. MallorySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. J.J. DeLuca Co. v. Toll Naval AssociatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  4. Bombar v. West American Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  5. K.H. v. J.R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Krepps, F. v. Snyder, K.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. Century Sur. Co. v. Essington Auto Ctr., LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Com. v. Peak, D.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  4. Grady, F. v. Nelson, B.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2022
  5. Ligonier Twp. v. M.S. Nied and P.J. Nied, her husband ~ Appeal of: M.S. Nied, P.J. Nied and Foxley Farm, LLCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API