Bishop v. Wight

I am unable to agree with the statement in the foregoing opinion that the injury occurred substantially as described in the portion of the answer quoted. That narrative declares that the defendant’s automobile was struck by Palmer’s automobile as Palmer was driving around the defendant, ¡hereby causing defendant’s car to veer toward the sidewalk, and to get beyond his control. Palmer was a witness on the trial and testified as follows:

“Q. Mr. Palmer, T didn’t gather altogether whether you meant to testify that ihis little knock that you heard came by reason of your car hitting Mr. Wight's car…