Hollweg v. Schaefer Brokerage Co.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of Ohio. Action by the Schaefer Brokerage Company against Louis Hollweg. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
KNAPPEN, Circuit Judge.
The defendant in error (who was plaintiff below) recovered verdict and judgment against plaintiff in error for $6,451.60 as damages for the breach of an alleged brokerage contract for the selling of fruit jars. The facts necessary to be stated! at this time are these:
Plaintiff in error (hereafter called defendant) was engaged in the manufacture of glass fruit jars at Greenfield, Ind., under the name of “Greenfield Eruit Jar & Bottle Company.” Plaintiff was a corporation engaged in merchandise brokerage, with office at Toledo, Ohio; Wil*692liam H. Schaefer being its…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Sibbald v. . the Bethlehem Iron CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- United States v. BehanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Wakeman v. Wheeler & Wilson Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Swain v. SeamansSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Central Coal & Coke Co. v. HartmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Boatright v. Steinite Radio Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1931
- Sargent v. Drew-English, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Chicago Life Ins. v. TiernanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1920
- Excelsior Motor Mfg. & Supply Co. v. Sound Equipment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1934
- Ash v. Chas F. Noble Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.