Allen v. Allen
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Weltner, Justice.
The trial court directed that the question of the enforceability of a settlement agreement be submitted to a jury. We granted the husband’s application for discretionary review of this issue.
1. The trial court, relying upon OCGA § 19-5-1, held that the wife was entitled to a jury trial as follows:
The [wife] insists that the contract, if any, was procured through duress and/or fraud. As a result, these questions become particularly ones for determination by jury, not the Court. This has been the law since at least 1884 when the case of Johnson v. Renfroe & McCrary, 73 Ga. 138…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Scherer v. SchererSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
- Amos v. AmosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
- Rogers v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Jones v. DoughertySupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
- Beall v. Surviving Executors of FoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Brown v. Liberty Oil & Refining Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Alexander v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
- Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- Dove v. DoveSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
- Blige v. BligeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.