Legal Opinion

Allen v. Allen

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 7, 1991No. S90A1626PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Weltner, Justice.

The trial court directed that the question of the enforceability of a settlement agreement be submitted to a jury. We granted the husband’s application for discretionary review of this issue.

1. The trial court, relying upon OCGA § 19-5-1, held that the wife was entitled to a jury trial as follows:

The [wife] insists that the contract, if any, was procured through duress and/or fraud. As a result, these questions become particularly ones for determination by jury, not the Court. This has been the law since at least 1884 when the case of Johnson v. Renfroe & McCrary, 73 Ga. 138…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Scherer v. SchererSupreme Court of Georgia · 1982
  2. Amos v. AmosSupreme Court of Georgia · 1956
  3. Rogers v. RogersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  4. Jones v. DoughertySupreme Court of Georgia · 1851
  5. Beall v. Surviving Executors of FoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1848

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brown v. Liberty Oil & Refining Corp.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Alexander v. AlexanderSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  3. Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  4. Dove v. DoveSupreme Court of Georgia · 2009
  5. Blige v. BligeSupreme Court of Georgia · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API