Legal Opinion

City of Shreveport v. Dickason

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 1, 1926No. 27562PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrunot, J.

The defendant is the owner of four lots of ground in the Guy & Stinson subdivision of the city of Shreveport. She applied to the building inspector for a permit to erect a gasoline filling station on the property. The permit was denied, and she instituted mandamus proceedings to compel its issuance. The defense to that suit was that Ordinances Nos. 7 of 1922 and 235 of 1923 of the city of Shreveport had zoned the section of the city in which plaintiff’s 'lots were situated, and the erection of business buildings within the territorial limits fixed in said ordinances was prohibited.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Dobbins v. Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. State ex rel. Civello v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1923
  4. Wells v. BlackmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  5. Wells v. FilesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Summerell v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
  2. Russian Hill Improvement Ass'n v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. City of New Orleans v. LevySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
  4. Roselle v. MoonachieNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. State Ex Rel. Manhein v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API