Legal Opinion

Romeo v. Van Otterloo

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 22, 1982No. Docket 54245PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtN. J. Kaufman, P.J.

Plaintiff appeals from an order of summary judgment in favor of defendant Ernst & Whinney (hereinafter defendant) based on plaintiff’s failure to state a cause of action, GCR 1963, 117.2(1).

Plaintiff’s wrongful death action arose out of an automobile accident that occurred at approximately 2:30 a.m. on the morning of April 6, 1978. On April 5, 1978, defendant held a party for one of its corporate clients to further the business relationship with that client. Defendant authorized a number of its employees and representatives, including John Neil Van Otterloo, to host the event. In the course…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Crowther v. Ross Chemical and Manufacturing Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Samson v. Saginaw Professional Building, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Manuel v. WeitzmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Cook v. BennettMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Murdock v. HigginsMichigan Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Duvall v. GoldinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. Millross v. Plum Hollow Golf ClubMichigan Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Landry v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Thies v. CooperSupreme Court of Kansas · 1988

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API