Rose v. US Nat. Bank of Omaha

I respectfully dissent. I do not feel that George P. Rose, Sr., has any standing in this case and that the action of the trial court in dismissing the case was proper and should be affirmed.

Plaintiffs, George P. Rose, Jr., and George P. Rose, Sr., brought this action in replevin and for damages on May 29, 1981. The petition alleged that George junior had purchased a pickup truck in July 1979; that George junior was the certificate of title holder as to the truck but that George senior had made all the payments on the truck; and that the defendant bank had a recorded lien on the certificate of…