Legal Opinion

Simpkins v. Ritter

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1973No. 38502PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

This is a replevin action brought by Agnes Simpkins to recover the possession of a horse named Cider Dave from Kate and Jack Ritter, wife and husband. Simpkins appeals from a judgment denying restitution of the horse and damages. We reverse.

The following questions are presented by this appeal: 1. Was the conveyance of Cider Dave to Kate Ritter an outright and unqualified conveyance of title and ownership, or was a bailment created with a reversionary interest reserved in Agnes Simpkins? 2. If a bailment was created, then was Cider Dave to be returned to Simpkins at the end of the 1971 racing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mimick v. BEATRICE FOODS COMPANYNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Luikart v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Peck v. Masonic Manor Apartment HotelNebraska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Rose v. US Nat. Bank of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Rose v. US Nat. Bank of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Simpkins v. RitterNebraska Supreme Court · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API