Legal Opinion · Dissent

Armco, Inc. v. Holcomb

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 22, 1985No. 60934Published

1DissentOpala, Justice

The court declares a compensation claim, brought more than twenty-two months after injury, to be timely because the applicable one-year limitation period prescribed in 85 O.S.1981 § 43 remained arrested by the employer’s noncompliance with § 81 of the Act. The opinion is rested on the holding that by the third paragraph of § 8 the employer who has knowledge of an injury stands required, in every instance, to advise the worker personally of the right to file a claim. For the reasons to be stated, I am unable to give the paragraph under consideration the sweeping effect that the court…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  2. Loffland Bros. Equipment v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  3. Purdy v. Flint Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
  4. Dixon v. Sinclair-Prairie Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
  5. Troup v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API