Jones v. Milton & Rushville Turnpike Co.
Indiana Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Wayne Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtPerkins, J.
Suit to recover instalments of stock subscribed to a turnpike company. The making of the subscription was denied under oath.
*548We think the evidence adduced on the trial authorized the jury to find that the subscription had been made. A subscription made by an agent, though beyond his given powers, if ratified by his principal, -will bind the latter, -^11 a^empl was made to set up parol conditions upon which the stock was subscribed. This was not allowable, except in a case of fraud. Ferris v. Ludlow, ante, p. 517.— Railsback v. The Liberty and Abington Turnpike Company, 2 Lid. R. 656.
It is…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Callanan v. JuddWisconsin Supreme Court · 1868
- Cressy v. Shannon Continental Corp.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Jones v. Concord & Montreal RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1891
- Kuhl v. MeyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1890
- Troy Mining Co. v. WhiteSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.