Legal Opinion

Kuhl v. Meyer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 9, 1890PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from the St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. Leroy B. Valliant, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Thompson, J:

This case was before this court on a former appeal, where the question was whether the petition stated a cause of action. Kuhl v. Meyer, 35 Mo. App. 206. We held that it did, but, at the same time, intimated that the action might be more properly brought in the name of the trustees of the society. Thereupon the petition was amended so as to bring an action in the name of the three trustees of the society. The petition in substance charges the defendant with having received certain funds as treasurer of the society, .and with refusing to pay them over to his successor in office.

The…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Stow v. WyseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1828
  2. Mulroy v. Supreme Lodge of the Knights of HonorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1888
  3. Coleman v. Supreme Lodge, Knights of HonorMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  4. Gable v. MillerNew York Court of Chancery · 1844
  5. Henry v. BassettSupreme Court of Missouri · 1881

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Swaine v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Stone v. BogueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1944
  3. Kuehl v. MeyerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Colley v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Farrar v. MessmerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API