Legal Opinion
Crestview of Ohio, Inc. v. Donahue
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 1, 1968No. 41261PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Per curiam
The determination of the Board of Tax Appeals that none of the four parcels of land owned by this admittedly worthwhile corporation are being used exclusively for charitable purposes is not unreasonable and unlawful, and the decision of the board is, therefore, affirmed.
The two parcels occupied by the Crestview Club Apartments, and the house of the executive director of Crestview of Ohio, Inc., are being used for private residences, and are not exempt. Philada Home Fund v. Board of Tax Appeals, 5 Ohio St. 2d 135, and cases there cited.
The parcel containing the small golf course for the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Planned Parenthood Ass'n v. Tax CommissionerOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- Philada Home Fund v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1966
- Cleveland Osteopathic Hospital v. ZangerleOhio Supreme Court · 1950
3Cited by7 opinions
- The Presbyterian Homes v. Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1970
- United Presbyterian Ass'n v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Colorado · 1968
- Toledo Business & Professional Women's Retirement Living, Inc. v. Board of Tax AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Defenders' Townhouse, Inc. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Carmelite Sisters v. Board of ReviewOhio Supreme Court · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.