Legal Opinion

State v. Denney

Court of Appeals of Utah

Decided June 14, 1989No. 880371-CAPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Judge:

Defendant appeals from the trial court’s revocation of his probation. He claims that his probation term automatically terminated after eighteen months by operation of law pursuant to Utah Code Ann. § 77-18-l(10)(a) (Supp.1986). 1 We agree and reverse.

Defendant pleaded guilty, on September 18, 1985, to two third degree felony charges of uttering a forged prescription under Utah Code Ann. § 58-37-8(4)(a)(iii) (1985). On March 20, 1986, he was sentenced to two indeterminate sentences of zero to five years at the Utah State Prison. The trial court suspended the prison term and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. DaughertySupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. State v. GarciaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. State v. GreenUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Chase v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1971

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. HodgesCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1990
  2. State v. MoyaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1991
  3. State v. PerkinsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  4. State v. CandedoCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008
  5. State v. GutierrezCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API