Legal Opinion
Canen v. Kraft
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 1, 1931No. 502PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, J.
Two questions are presented by the record: Whether a liability insurance company can be joined with the automobile owner in a suit for' personal injury sus- ’ tained by reason of the negligence of the latter, and whether a minor child 'may maintain an action for personal injuries sustained by negligence of the father in operating the car in which they are riding.
The amended petition contains no allegations which show that the policy given by the insurance company to the father by its terms made the insurance company directly liable to the person injured. It appears that it was an ordinary…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dunlap v. DunlapSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1930
- Small Ex Rel. Balthis v. MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
- Wick v. WickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
- Sorrentino v. SorrentinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Mesite v. KirchensteinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Chitlik v. Allstate Ins.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1973
- Chaffin v. ChaffinOregon Supreme Court · 1964
- Luster v. LusterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1938
- McKinney v. McKinneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1943
- Builders & Mfrs. Mut. Casualty Co. v. Preferred Automobile Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.