Legal Opinion

Local 1325, Retail Clerks International Association, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Topps Kerrmill, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 13, 1963No. 6205_1PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

On these petitions for review and enforcement of a Labor Board order the only question we find worth discussing is whether an employer, who has afforded a union access to the plant and reasonable but not excessive assistance in its organizational campaign in admitted ignorance that another union was also attempting organization, has unfairly discriminated against the rival union by failing to grant that union’s request for equal access made only after the first union had signed up a substantial majority of the employees. 1 The Board, apparently because the rival union had been in the course…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bernhardt Bros. Tugboat Service, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1964
  2. Continental Distilling Sales Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
  3. Hughes & Hatcher, Inc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  4. Continental Distilling Sales Company v. National Labor Relations Board, International Union of United Brewery, Flour, Cereal, Soft Drink & Distillery Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1965
  5. Hughes & Hatcher, Inc. And Its Wholly Owned Subsidiary, Oppenheim's, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, Central States Joint Board, Retail & Department Store Employees, Etc. v. National Labor Relations BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API