Legal Opinion

Bank of Philadelphia v. Posey

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1922No. 22247PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, C. J.

When J. R. Brantley purchased the land in controversy from Jones Brantley, the judgment rendered against him, Jones and Z. A. Brantley in favor of the Milburn Wagon Company in 1907 was not only void, under the rule applied in Weis v. Aaron, 75 Miss. 138, 21 So. 763, 63 Am. St. Rep. 594; Comenitz v. Bank, 85 Miss. 662, 38 So. 35; Hardware & Implement Co. v. Marshall, 117 Miss. 224, 78 So. 7, and Boutwell v. Grayson, 118 Miss. 80, 79 So. 61, but, if valid, would have been barred by the statute of limitation, and the judgment against Jones and Z. A. Brantley in favor of the Millburn Wagon…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weis v. AaronMississippi Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Comenitz v. Bank of CommerceMississippi Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Boutwell v. GraysonMississippi Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Carrollton Hardware & Implement Co. v. MarshallMississippi Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Pearthree v. Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Erickson v. AmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  3. Wise v. CobbMississippi Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Barbour v. BarbourMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Barbour v. BarbourMontana Supreme Court · 1958

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API