Legal Opinion

Tritschler v. Cartwright

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1959Published

1Opinion

On Petition to Beheár

Complainant, by petition to rehear, complains of our holding that the Chancery Court had no jurisdiction of this suit because it was a case of “an equitable nature” under the value of $50, within the rule limiting that *672court’s jurisdiction to cases above that amount (T. C. A. sec. 16-603).

It is urged that the rule does not apply to a case like this; that the Chancery Court has jurisdiction of such a case however trifling its amount; that this jurisdictional limit as to amount does not apply to a suit, such as this, to establish a right, but only to a suit to recover a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Bank of Commerce & Trust Co. v. SenterTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Rutherford v. City of NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Covert v. Nashville, C. & St. L. Ry.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Alexander v. HendersonTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Wise v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1945

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API