Legal Opinion

Thompson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 7, 1936No. 24907PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

Acts merely preparatory to tlie commission of quasi-criminal acts such as, if completed, would subject an automobile to condemnation under the Code of 1933, § 58-207, are not sufficient to evoke the penalties of the statute. Groves v. State, 116 Ga. 516 (42 S. E. 755, 59 L. R. A. 598); Armington v. State, 24 Ga. App. 75, 79-80 (100 S. E. 15); Coffee v. State, 39 Ga. App. 664 (148 S. E. 303). Where in such a condemnation proceeding the only evidence as to any actual use of the automobile to convey alcoholic liquors was that it was standing still in a private way near a residence where…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Groves v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Armington & Sons v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
  3. Coffee v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Leath v. RosserCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  2. Slater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  3. Slater v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API