Legal Opinion

Geffert v. Kayser

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1923PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, J.

We will first consider the liability of the defendant Adolph H. Kayser. It appears without dispute that the automobile, which was at the time of the accident being driven by Paul Kayser, was owned by Adolph H. Kayser. It further clearly appears that Paul Kayser had procured his father’s permission to take the car for the purpose of taking a young lady to a dance, and that he was on his way from his father’s home to the residence where he was to call for her at the time the accident occurred. It is claimed that going to the dance was part of the education of Paul Kayser, who at the time was a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Crossett v. GoelzerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Brickell v. TreckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Mahar v. Montello Granite Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Friedrich v. BoultonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. DroppersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Zeidler v. GoelzerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Papke v. HaerleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Salsich v. BunnWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Olberg v. KroehlerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API