Legal Opinion

Yannuzzi v. Mitchell

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 3, 1978No. 306PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge:

This action comes before our court as an appeal from an order of the lower court denying appellants’ motion for a new trial. The motion was based upon alleged errors by the trial judge in charging the jury in a trespass action. We hold the lower court’s order to be error and remand for a new trial. The following facts were adduced at trial.

On January 4, 1970, appellant, Anthony Yannuzzi, was operating a motor vehicle in a westerly direction on a road in Delaware County. With him in the vehicle were the other appellants, Catherine, his wife, and Thomas, their minor son. At the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. SMALICH v. WestfallSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  2. McCay v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Azinger v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  4. Heffernan v. RosserSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Crane v. NealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Phillips v. SchoenbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Clayton v. McCulloughSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Hanlon v. SorensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Hanlon v. SorensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Shutter v. ReillySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API