Legal Opinion

People v. Utica Cement Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 11, 1886PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of La Salle County; the Hon. Geobge W. Stipp, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtWelch, J.

The only questions presented fa*’ our consideration upon the assignment of errors on this record are those arising upon the instructions. We shall consider them in the order presented. It is first insisted that the court erred in giving the eleventh instruction for the appellee, and also in refusing to give the qualification thereto, asked by the appellants. The eleventh instruction, as given, was as follows:

11th. Althoúgh' the jury may believe, from the evidence, that the Illinois and Michigan canal has been damaged by the flow of the waters of the creek in question, still, if the jury…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Johnson v. PeacockIllinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Latham v. RoachIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. StanbroIllinois Supreme Court · 1877

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ithaca Roller Mills v. Ann Arbor RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Miller v. WilsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1902
  3. Smith v. Toledo, St. Louis & Western RailroadAppellate Court of Illinois · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API