Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 1, 1971No. 71-1194PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFIN, Circuit Judge.
When this case was remanded to the district court, United States v. Michael Schiavone & Sons, Inc., 430 F.2d 231 (1st Cir. 1970), it was a new ball game with new ground rules. The district court’s ruling on remand that it was too late to go into the dollar amount of the defendant’s gross cost was erroneous — an error for which we take some responsibility because of a reasonable, though unintended, interpretation of language in our opinion. The fact is that the expenditure for the office building was not an obligation under the lease. Under our prior ruling, therefore, it…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rodgers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc. v. AmiraultCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
- United States v. United Drill & Tool Corp. United Drill & Tool Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
- United States v. West Texas Cottonoil Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1946
- Swartzbaugh Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Michael J. Foley v. City of Lowell, Massachusetts, Michael J. Foley v. City of Lowell, MassachusettsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Clyde A. Perkins v. Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
- Ramey v. Cincinnati Enquirer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974
- William Cordero v. Juan De Jesus-Mendez, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Wesley T. Bailey v. Chattem, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.