Legal Opinion

Hoh Indian Tribe v. Baldrige

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 22, 1981No. C 81-742R(C)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

CRAIG, Senior District Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

This case involves the treaty fishing rights of three separate Washington coastal Indian tribes as they are affected by the regulations of the defendant Secretary of Commerce governing fishing for salmon in the waters of the Fishery Conservation Zone off California, Oregon, Washington, and Alaska and regulations of the intervenor-defendant State of Washington in state waters of northwestern Washington.

The action was commenced on June 22, 1981, and the matter came on for hearing August 3, 1981, on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Washington v. Washington State Commercial Passenger Fishing Vessel Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. WashingtonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1974
  3. Poe v. WeinbergerDistrict Court, N.D. West Virginia · 1975

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Gig and Jeannette Eberhardt, United States of America v. Tom Wilson and Sonny Erickson, United States of America v. Diane Sue Mattz, Atone ("Tony") W. Folkins, and Randy MattzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
  2. Purse Seine Vessel Owners Ass'n v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
  3. United States v. OregonDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1988
  4. Washington State Charterboat Association v. Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. Washington Crab Producers, Inc. v. MosbacherCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API