Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fuller v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 6, 1926No. 12044Published

1DissentJustice Cothran

(dissenting) : I am convinced that the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict in this case should have been granted, and therefore I dissent from the affirmance of the judgment indicated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Stabler, for the reasons which follow:

The undisputed facts are that on March 30, 1922, the defendant issued to William PI. Fuller, through one of its local camps, at Fair Play, S. C., a certificate of membership in the fraternal association, carrying insurance upon his life in the sum of $1,000, the plaintiff, Mamie Fuller, his wife, being named as beneficiary. Pie paid the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Insurance Co. v. EgglestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Queen Insurance v. Patterson Drug Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1917
  4. Kingman v. Lancashire Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1899
  5. State Ex Rel. Birchmore v. State Board of CanvassersSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1907

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API